
“Reader suppose you were an idiot.
And suppose you
were a member of Congress
(and/or Florida's leadership)
But I repeat myself."
–Mark
Twain
The high cost of energy
By JOHN ALGER, New Smyrna Beach
April 27, 2010 12:05 AM
While the Legislature is winding up its session, it has been made clear that the state solar rebate program will very likely not be funded.
What a shame. We all know that the state is facing severe financial shortfalls and given a choice between keeping our teachers working or paying our rebates for solar systems, who would not vote for teachers, police and other necessary services. The tragedy is that there have been plans to shore up this program which helps to create jobs and put trades people like plumbers and electricians back to work. A public benefits fund has been proposed which would essentially add about $3 to each property-tax bill per year.
Yet, some of our representatives have promised to kill this idea or any other plan that adds any property-tax liability especially to the low-income families. The reality is that many of these families are already paying for that and more in the form of an increase approved by the Public Service Commission in 2007 which allows FPL and Progress to add $10.71 per month to each rate payer to finance new nuclear plants that may or may not ever get built. In fact, that cost is estimated to rise to $44.86 per month by 2016. That's every month.
In addition, there has been a move to classify nuclear as a clean energy source because it does not emit carbon dioxide. I am in favor of nuclear but I don't see how a fuel that has a waste product that is used to make nuclear weapons can be called a clean fuel. If the waste is clean, how about pouring some of it on these proponents front yards?
Gainesville's city utility implemented a feed-in tariff last year to promote renewable energy. They actually pay out 32 cents per kilowatt-hour for electrical generation and it is open to anyone with a rooftop or open land area. What is the cost to the rate payers to fund this program? About 90 cents per month, a figure that their rate payers felt was a bargain to proliferate this technology and create jobs.
I don't think that most people realize how much money is spent on conventional energy in the form of tax subsidies, clean up, and environmental degradation. We will never replace coal and nuclear in our lifetime however, for less than many are spending on the status quo, we can jump-start a new industry and make Florida the sunshine state that we claim to be.
We need a funded rebate program and a statewide feed-in tariff to make sure our solar industry gets traction. If not, we stand to fall behind not only in jobs creation, but the technology and development that has happened in California and of all places, New Jersey (second in the country for renewable implementation).
We have a shot to jump ahead of Georgia,
Alabama,
and the rest of the southeastern states
if we act aggressively now